Split-GAL4 lines targeting PPL1
How many split-GAL4 combinations does VFB hold for the PPL1 dopaminergic neurons, and which subtypes actually have coverage?
Asked at the VFB table, NeuroFly 2026 (Cologne), 8 September 2026.
The question
“Splits targeting PPL1?”
A typical table question: someone working on the dopaminergic PPL1 cluster wanted to know what split-GAL4 tools exist to target it.
How we answered it
search_termsfor “PPL1” — resolves to the class dopaminergic PPL1 neuron (FBbt:00100219, symbol PPL1).get_term_info+run_query(SplitsTargeting) on that class directly — this only found one split-GAL4 combination annotated at the whole-cluster level, which seemed too low given how well-studied PPL1 is.run_query(SubclassesOf) on the same class — PPL1 has 18 named subtypes (the six individually numbered PPL101–PPL106, several SMP/dFB/MB-AMP/DP/MB-SV neurons, and the fan-shaped-body-projecting FB5H/FB6H/FB7B).run_query(SplitsTargeting), batched across all 18 subtype IDs — this is where almost all of VFB’s split coverage actually lives.- For the four subtypes with zero splits,
run_query(TransgeneExpressionHere) to check for non-split (single-transgene) driver lines instead, thenrun_query(FindStocks) on any transgene IDs found, to get orderable stock numbers.
What we found
Querying the whole class only surfaces splits explicitly annotated at that level — it does not aggregate splits recorded against its subtypes. That one whole-cluster result was P{ple-GAL4.DBD.TH-C} ∩ P{DAT-B-p65.AD}.
Splitting the query out by subtype tells a very different story:
| PPL1 subtype | FBbt ID | Splits (VFB) |
|---|---|---|
| PPL101 | FBbt:00100243 | 33 |
| PPL105 | FBbt:00100236 | 31 |
| PPL106 | FBbt:00110320 | 30 |
| PPL103 | FBbt:00100241 | 28 |
| dFB neuron | FBbt:00110322 | 27 |
| PPL104 | FBbt:00110321 | 26 |
| SMP neuron | FBbt:00048269 | 15 |
| SMP-gamma neuron | FBbt:00048251 | 14 |
| SMP-PED neuron | FBbt:00048250 | 13 |
| bSMP-gamma neuron | FBbt:00048252 | 13 |
| MB-AMP neuron | FBbt:00110324 | 10 |
| FB5H / FB6H / FB7B | FBbt:00051241 / 00051242 / 00051243 | 1 (same combination, shared by all three) |
| PPL102 | FBbt:00111025 | 0 |
| mushroom body PPL1 neuron (umbrella grouping) | FBbt:00049840 | 0 |
| DP neuron | FBbt:00110319 | 0 |
| MB-SV neuron | FBbt:00110323 | 0 |
Two of the zero-split subtypes (PPL102 and DP neuron) have no driver-line data of any kind in VFB — not even a single-transgene line, split or otherwise. For the other two, TransgeneExpressionHere did turn up single-transgene (non-split) lines, though with a caveat worth stating plainly: VFB’s own expressed_in annotation on those records points to other, more specific PPL1 subtypes rather than to MB-SV or the umbrella “mushroom body PPL1 neuron” grouping itself. Three of those single-transgene lines have orderable Bloomington stocks:
| Driver | VFB-annotated target | Stock |
|---|---|---|
| GMR25D01-lexA | PPL103 | FBst0053519 / FBst0094684 |
| GMR30E11-lexA | PPL101 | FBst0054209 |
| GMR50B03-GAL4 | PPL105 | FBst0038727 |
Worth being honest about: the high per-subtype counts (26–33) are not that many distinct tools — they’re mostly recombinations of a small, shared pool of hemidriver lines (DAT-B, ple-GAL4.DBD TH-C/D/F, R55C10, R60F07, R76F01, R76F02, R76F05, R61H03…) paired against each other, and a single split-GAL4 line commonly labels several PPL1 subtypes at once — so the per-row counts overlap heavily and don’t sum to a meaningful class-wide total. “SplitsTargeting” also only records an expression-pattern-to-class annotation, not whether a split is clean or specific to that one subtype.
Sources
- FBbt:00100219 — dopaminergic PPL1 neuron (PPL1)
- Xie et al., 2018, Cell Rep. 23(2):652–665; Aso et al., 2014, eLife 3:e04577/e04580; Aso and Rubin, 2016, eLife 5:e16135